EyeOn FSERT Program Questions and Answers
What type of improvements can participants in this program expect?
The first difference you’ll notice is the feel of having more power coming from your engine. Cars and trucks have been able to climb minor hills in a higher gear. The next difference will be the increase in MPG. Depending on the type of vehicle you have one can expect an increase between 20% and over 50%. The greatest gains in MPG will be realized with highway driving.
What type of development has occurred in this program over the years?
Initially we used a variety of treatment methods and eventually settled on a molecular bonding agent to treat the filters. We were getting nice results but the output we knew should be better. A special coating was designed for EyeOn by a chemist that enhanced the electron output and is now in use today.
Why haven’t other companies around the world achieved these results?
I’ve read about other companies attempting to accomplish this by making changes to the fuel injectors and a variety of other engine components. I understand the Japanese also attempted to do something very similar but to our knowledge have failed. The other minerals used to make the EyeOn compound increase the electron output from 1x to over 20x.
What sort of results can we expect?
Here are some examples:
PED = Performance Enhancement Device, our old products using a molecular bonding technology
EFSERT = Present technology in use today
The City, Highway and Combined mileage figures are from either the US Gov. or the OEM.
2005 Mini Cooper S EFSERT Results 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora PED EFSERT Results
City – 24 30 City – 15
Highway – 29 52-53 Highway – 24 25 33
Combined – 21 37 Combined – 18 27.76
Test was conducted by a third party
2003 Infiniti Q45 EyeOn 1998 Volvo V70 AWD >120k
City – 10 17 City – 16 23.5
Highway – >14 27 Highway – 23 33
Combined – >12 21 Combined – 19 28.4
Multiple EyeOn technologies used Test was conducted by a third party
Mercedes 4000 Truck Recycling inner city truck Detroit S60 Recycling inner city truck
City – 3.8 5.625 (PED) City – 3.81 5.22 (PED)
Highway – Highway –
Combined – increase over 32%. Combined –
Test was conducted by a third party Test was conducted by a third party
2013 Ford Fusion EyeOn 2011 Hyundai EyeOn
City – 22 26 City – 22
Highway – >26 46.05 Highway – 35 52.2
Combined – >34 38 Combined – 26
2009 Ford F550 Diesel Extended Cab
Third party test using the new coating
Owner has been getting an average of 10.8 mpg. Filter was treated, truck was fully loaded with construction tools, tanks filled and using back roads drove to the NJ shore from PA and managed an 18.6 mpg, a 42% increase in what should be considered COMBINED mpg.
One interesting detail about this test is the filter was constructed in such a manner that we couldn’t treat it as well as we wanted. We still need to work with this closed filter in order to see if we can improve its performance and I believe we can.
EFSERT Emissions
Perhaps the most important benefit of the EFSERTs is the effect the technology has on emissions. Emission testing is expensive and the only test conducted was on the first beta, bonding product that produced less than one extra mpg. Emissions were reduced by 36%. We believe emissions may now be reduced by as much as between 60% and 90%. We look forward to working with a local company that invented the PA emissions testing equipment to verify and help us enhance the emissions reduction.
The EFSERTs can be applied not only to cars and trucks but also to ships, trains, boats, aircraft and equipment used for farming, construction, mining, industry, etc.
How much can we really save?
Some results will depend on how you drive. Often people enjoy the feeling of having the extra power and their foot becomes a little heavier. Once you get over the joy of such an experience and focus on driving normally then you can see results like the following:
• Tractor Trailer Long Haul Test
One long haul road test with a tractor trailer carrying a full load to Wyoming from NNJ and back had better than a 42% increase in mpg and saved over fifteen hundred dollars in fuel costs.
• The 2005 Mini Cooper
If the vehicle is driven 12,000 miles per year then using the combined figure of 21 mpg, the vehicle would use 571 gallons. 571 x $3.00 = $1,717.29. Using the EFSERT the combined mileage was 37 mpg, the vehicle would use 324 gallons. 324 x $3.00 = $972.27. That is a savings of $741.34.
• 1998 Volvo V70 All Wheel Drive with over 120k miles
This vehicle was driven just under 9000 miles per year and was getting average 17.6 combined miles per gallon and used 511.4 gallons per year. 511.40 x $3.00 = $1,534.09. The EFSERT combined mpg was 28.4 mpg and used 316.9 gallons. 316.9 x $3.00 = $950.70. That is a savings of $583.39
Obviously if you’re spending more time on the road you can easily envision the amount to be saved using the EFSERTs but the contribution you’re making through the emissions reductions may be much more important.
How does the program operate and what does it cost?
You provide us with an air filter that fits your vehicle along with $75+ donation to be used for shipping and handling, product preparation and additional research to become part of the program. The filter will be treated with EyeOn and returned. We ask that you provide us with at least three weeks of driving records, more if you would be so kind and the filter is yours to keep. We would like to have your email address in order to keep you posted with other results, changes and modifications made to these products. Once you realize the difference EyeOn has made please feel free to share this information with your other family members and friends so they can take advantage of this program as well.
Our goal is to procure as much statistical data as possible. We may want to make some minor adjustments to the EFSERTs for the program participants only for the price of providing another filter that will be treated and returned for testing and another three weeks of data.
Why should this program be so important to me?
One should understand we not only will help you save money on fuel costs but increase engine power and performance in addition to reducing emissions, which in turn will help slow down global warming. We need to run additional emissions tests to learn exactly how much we’re reducing emissions since only one was made during the very first test with a beta product on a dynamometer that only increased mpg less than one mpg but reduced emissions by 36%. The tests were conducted by a company certified by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), DOT (department of transportation) and NHTSA (National Highway and Transportation Safety Administration) The way EyeOn technology functions we believe we’ll be able to reduce emissions anywhere from fifty to more than eighty percent.
What can EyeOn FSERTs do for our future?
Estimates of 15.5 million trucks operate in the U.S. Of this figure 2 million are tractor trailers. In 2006 the transportation industry logged 432.9 billion miles. Class 8 trucks accounted for 139.3 billion of those miles, up from 130.5 billion in 2005. At an average six miles per gallon they used 72,150,000,000 gallons of diesel. A 16% increase in mpg would save 11,544,000,000 gallons worth $46,176,000,000. It only takes a decrease of ten percent to end our reliance on foreign oil imports. These figures are old and when you include the remaining 13.5 million trucks along with 254.4 million registered automobiles in the US, if all were using an EyeOn filter increasing mpg by an average 30%+ and decreasing emissions by 50%+ I’m sure you can easily imagine the impact this will have on our country’s economy and air quality.
The use of the technology is not limited to cars and trucks. EyeOn technology can easily be used to realize the same benefits in farm equipment, ships, railroad engines, aircraft, industries and more. There hasn’t been a time of greater need to solve these problems and change our direction than ever before. EyeOn technology is committed to improve our results that have already been verified by various third parties.
Third Parties
Universal Technical Institute (UTI) Automotive Trade School not only to improve the filter performance but to add more certification.
The first difference you’ll notice is the feel of having more power coming from your engine. Cars and trucks have been able to climb minor hills in a higher gear. The next difference will be the increase in MPG. Depending on the type of vehicle you have one can expect an increase between 20% and over 50%. The greatest gains in MPG will be realized with highway driving.
What type of development has occurred in this program over the years?
Initially we used a variety of treatment methods and eventually settled on a molecular bonding agent to treat the filters. We were getting nice results but the output we knew should be better. A special coating was designed for EyeOn by a chemist that enhanced the electron output and is now in use today.
Why haven’t other companies around the world achieved these results?
I’ve read about other companies attempting to accomplish this by making changes to the fuel injectors and a variety of other engine components. I understand the Japanese also attempted to do something very similar but to our knowledge have failed. The other minerals used to make the EyeOn compound increase the electron output from 1x to over 20x.
What sort of results can we expect?
Here are some examples:
PED = Performance Enhancement Device, our old products using a molecular bonding technology
EFSERT = Present technology in use today
The City, Highway and Combined mileage figures are from either the US Gov. or the OEM.
2005 Mini Cooper S EFSERT Results 2003 Oldsmobile Aurora PED EFSERT Results
City – 24 30 City – 15
Highway – 29 52-53 Highway – 24 25 33
Combined – 21 37 Combined – 18 27.76
Test was conducted by a third party
2003 Infiniti Q45 EyeOn 1998 Volvo V70 AWD >120k
City – 10 17 City – 16 23.5
Highway – >14 27 Highway – 23 33
Combined – >12 21 Combined – 19 28.4
Multiple EyeOn technologies used Test was conducted by a third party
Mercedes 4000 Truck Recycling inner city truck Detroit S60 Recycling inner city truck
City – 3.8 5.625 (PED) City – 3.81 5.22 (PED)
Highway – Highway –
Combined – increase over 32%. Combined –
Test was conducted by a third party Test was conducted by a third party
2013 Ford Fusion EyeOn 2011 Hyundai EyeOn
City – 22 26 City – 22
Highway – >26 46.05 Highway – 35 52.2
Combined – >34 38 Combined – 26
2009 Ford F550 Diesel Extended Cab
Third party test using the new coating
Owner has been getting an average of 10.8 mpg. Filter was treated, truck was fully loaded with construction tools, tanks filled and using back roads drove to the NJ shore from PA and managed an 18.6 mpg, a 42% increase in what should be considered COMBINED mpg.
One interesting detail about this test is the filter was constructed in such a manner that we couldn’t treat it as well as we wanted. We still need to work with this closed filter in order to see if we can improve its performance and I believe we can.
EFSERT Emissions
Perhaps the most important benefit of the EFSERTs is the effect the technology has on emissions. Emission testing is expensive and the only test conducted was on the first beta, bonding product that produced less than one extra mpg. Emissions were reduced by 36%. We believe emissions may now be reduced by as much as between 60% and 90%. We look forward to working with a local company that invented the PA emissions testing equipment to verify and help us enhance the emissions reduction.
The EFSERTs can be applied not only to cars and trucks but also to ships, trains, boats, aircraft and equipment used for farming, construction, mining, industry, etc.
How much can we really save?
Some results will depend on how you drive. Often people enjoy the feeling of having the extra power and their foot becomes a little heavier. Once you get over the joy of such an experience and focus on driving normally then you can see results like the following:
• Tractor Trailer Long Haul Test
One long haul road test with a tractor trailer carrying a full load to Wyoming from NNJ and back had better than a 42% increase in mpg and saved over fifteen hundred dollars in fuel costs.
• The 2005 Mini Cooper
If the vehicle is driven 12,000 miles per year then using the combined figure of 21 mpg, the vehicle would use 571 gallons. 571 x $3.00 = $1,717.29. Using the EFSERT the combined mileage was 37 mpg, the vehicle would use 324 gallons. 324 x $3.00 = $972.27. That is a savings of $741.34.
• 1998 Volvo V70 All Wheel Drive with over 120k miles
This vehicle was driven just under 9000 miles per year and was getting average 17.6 combined miles per gallon and used 511.4 gallons per year. 511.40 x $3.00 = $1,534.09. The EFSERT combined mpg was 28.4 mpg and used 316.9 gallons. 316.9 x $3.00 = $950.70. That is a savings of $583.39
Obviously if you’re spending more time on the road you can easily envision the amount to be saved using the EFSERTs but the contribution you’re making through the emissions reductions may be much more important.
How does the program operate and what does it cost?
You provide us with an air filter that fits your vehicle along with $75+ donation to be used for shipping and handling, product preparation and additional research to become part of the program. The filter will be treated with EyeOn and returned. We ask that you provide us with at least three weeks of driving records, more if you would be so kind and the filter is yours to keep. We would like to have your email address in order to keep you posted with other results, changes and modifications made to these products. Once you realize the difference EyeOn has made please feel free to share this information with your other family members and friends so they can take advantage of this program as well.
Our goal is to procure as much statistical data as possible. We may want to make some minor adjustments to the EFSERTs for the program participants only for the price of providing another filter that will be treated and returned for testing and another three weeks of data.
Why should this program be so important to me?
One should understand we not only will help you save money on fuel costs but increase engine power and performance in addition to reducing emissions, which in turn will help slow down global warming. We need to run additional emissions tests to learn exactly how much we’re reducing emissions since only one was made during the very first test with a beta product on a dynamometer that only increased mpg less than one mpg but reduced emissions by 36%. The tests were conducted by a company certified by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), DOT (department of transportation) and NHTSA (National Highway and Transportation Safety Administration) The way EyeOn technology functions we believe we’ll be able to reduce emissions anywhere from fifty to more than eighty percent.
What can EyeOn FSERTs do for our future?
Estimates of 15.5 million trucks operate in the U.S. Of this figure 2 million are tractor trailers. In 2006 the transportation industry logged 432.9 billion miles. Class 8 trucks accounted for 139.3 billion of those miles, up from 130.5 billion in 2005. At an average six miles per gallon they used 72,150,000,000 gallons of diesel. A 16% increase in mpg would save 11,544,000,000 gallons worth $46,176,000,000. It only takes a decrease of ten percent to end our reliance on foreign oil imports. These figures are old and when you include the remaining 13.5 million trucks along with 254.4 million registered automobiles in the US, if all were using an EyeOn filter increasing mpg by an average 30%+ and decreasing emissions by 50%+ I’m sure you can easily imagine the impact this will have on our country’s economy and air quality.
The use of the technology is not limited to cars and trucks. EyeOn technology can easily be used to realize the same benefits in farm equipment, ships, railroad engines, aircraft, industries and more. There hasn’t been a time of greater need to solve these problems and change our direction than ever before. EyeOn technology is committed to improve our results that have already been verified by various third parties.
Third Parties
Universal Technical Institute (UTI) Automotive Trade School not only to improve the filter performance but to add more certification.
